A classical narrative consists of a basic structure involving distinct stages. At first there is the equilibrium. The hero is set in a calm and balanced environment. An outsider then disrupts the equilibrium. The remaining characters recognise that something has changed and they must search for a solution. An attempt to restore balance is made to then finally return to equilibrium. This is Todorov's theory of a Narrative structure.
In regards to Homeland this is not the case necessarily. We are first introduced to the characters in a manic formation rather than a calm balance. Enigma is created by leading on the TV series with cliffhangers at the end of each episode. This challenges the concept of a classical narrative as Todorov's theory relates more to films rather than a TV series.
Homeland explores elements of an anti-classical narrative by having a female protagonist. Her character itself challenges Mulvey's theory of the male gaze and the idea of objectifying women. Carrie is portrayed as a strong, determined character.
The character David also counter argues the conventions of a classical narrative, going against the race of a stereotypical CIA boss. He obtains a powerful position and makes decisions, controlling Saul and Carrie-both respected characters. We wouldn't usually see an african-american in this position.
Actually, Todorov was writing about Russian fairytales, but his work has been applied to films and other forms of stories by others with some success.
ReplyDeleteA little brief and unclear. Perhaps you need to do a little more research when thinking about how Todorov's theory might apply. You started well then gave up before the end.
Is Homeland a classical narrative? Always be sure to answer the question.